Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2710 14
Original file (NR2710 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
SEAETMENT OF ue he ee

SRE FOR CORRECTION OF NF VAL PECOPDS

(
r

cor ACSF Ree ee SUT Phe

ARLINGTON. WA 22204-2490

 

Docket No: 44.0 Le
94 November 2014

 

    

This is in reference to your applicati on for ¢ rrection of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United

States Code, Section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
1 i ecul ession, considered your

   

Records, sitting in executive §

application on 19 November 2014. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request . Your
allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance
with administ rative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of yout application, the ith all
mater, ial submitted in support thereof a cord and
appl licable statutes, regulations, and po addition, the
Board consid ered the att ached advisory nished by
Headqua Marine Corpse, copies of which a attached for your
inform

 

ee LOA

record, the Boara -L
insufficient to establish the exi

rror or injustice. In thi
concurred with the comment
necordingly, your applicat:

Biter care Eul ane conscientious con ideration of the

te. ie regretted that the circumstances of your
favorable action cannot be taken. You are
Board reconsider its decision upon submis
evidence or other matter not previously
tm this ee a

@

‘cled to have the

£ new and material
the Board.
“~ e& gored 1 ies of an ere icias navat

jicant to demonstrate the
or or injustice.

WN Mal

- DMs - <
/ 2OBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director

sey Lae Yack re

Consequentiy, when applysng -<+
record, the burden is on the app

existence of probable material err

Enclosures

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5107 14

    Original file (NR5107 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered your response to the advisory opinion dated 7 Nov 2014, However, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10589 14

    Original file (NR10589 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Orr THE WAVY F Ee : CORRECTION OF NAVAL RE CORDS uu INGTON, VA 22204-2420 JSR Docket No: NR10589-14 4 Decemper 2014 Dear Colonel ee * : This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section L552 » You requested % that the fitness report for 7 December 2009 to 21 July 2010 be modified by removing the entire section K (reviewing officer’s (RO’S) marks and comments) . New evidence is evidence not...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10591 14

    Original file (NR10591 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Rem s ReeRIe Om ORD A SNE Bre Re er ee OT jas ZN fhe 7 y POAPD FOR C ORRECTION OF NAVA! RECORNDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, Sulit UN ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JSR Docket No: NR10591-14 ere TR a Awl - -- AM A Dear Staff sero gap i This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States ‘Code, section 1552. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8329 14

    Original file (NR8329 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR199 14

    Original file (NR199 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    & three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6088 14

    Original file (NR6088 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4280 14

    Original file (NR4280 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a COPY of which is atkached .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10805 14

    Original file (NR10805 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9926 14

    Original file (NR9926 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the anplicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material Re Ce te a a ee tee a, ~~ Ge DGD -ate _ error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5271 14

    Original file (NR5271 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    B three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2014. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 17 April 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.